True or False: The inclusion of irrigation fluid additives such as iodine has proven benefits.

The statement that "the inclusion of irrigation fluid additives such as iodine has proven benefits" is considered false. Research indicates that while some additives may be used to enhance the antimicrobial properties of irrigation fluids, there is limited evidence supporting the regular use of iodine or similar compounds in wound irrigation procedures. In fact, certain additives can potentially cause tissue toxicity or delay healing, which raises concerns about their true efficacy and safety in practice.

When it comes to wound irrigation, the focus has shifted towards using saline or water as primary solutions, as they are less likely to irritate the tissues and do not have the adverse effects associated with iodine or other additives. The use of bacitracin and antibiotics is sometimes recommended in specific circumstances, but no broad consensus exists that highlights the notable benefits of iodine in irrigation fluid as a routine practice. Therefore, stating that "only bacitracin has proven benefits" or "only antibiotics have proven benefits" does not align with the prevailing medical guidance surrounding wound care and irrigation practices.